Sony A7 IV vs Canon EOS R6 Mark III

Complete Technical Specifications

Comparison Table

Technical ParameterCanon EOS R6 Mark IIISony A7 IVDifferenceProfessional Impact
Sensor32.5MP Full-Frame BSI CMOS33.0MP Full-Frame BSI CMOS-0.5MPNo practical difference in resolution
Sensor Readout Speed13.5ms67.6ms54.1ms fasterCanon: Minimal rolling shutter distortion
Max Burst Rate (ES)40 fps (Lossless RAW)10 fps (Compressed RAW)30 fps advantageCanon captures 4x more frames per second
Max Burst Rate (MS)12 fps10 fps2 fps advantageMinor improvement for mechanical shooting
Pre-Capture Buffer20 frames @ 40fpsNoneN/ACanon captures 0.5s before shutter press
AF Low-Light LimitEV -6.5EV -4.02.5 stops betterCanon focuses in near darkness
AF Coverage100% sensor area (1053 zones)94% sensor area (759 points)6% more coverageCanon better for edge compositions
IBIS Performance8.5 stops (w/ IS lens)5.5 stops3 stops advantageCanon enables 1/8s handheld @ 200mm
Video Resolution Max7K DCI RAW 12-bit 60p4K UHD 10-bit 4:2:2 60p3K resolution gapCanon: 49.3MP vs Sony: 8.3MP source
4K 60p Crop Factor1.0x (Full-frame)1.5x (APS-C)0.5x crop advantageCanon maintains native FOV
Open Gate Recording7K 3:2 (6960×4640)NoneN/ACanon: 32.3MP vs standard 4K 8.3MP
Log ProfilesC-Log2 (15+ stops), C-Log3S-Log3 (14+ stops)1+ stop advantageCanon captures more highlight detail
Color Sampling4:2:2 10-bit internal4:2:2 10-bit internalTieBoth suitable for professional grading
Monitoring ToolsWaveform, False Color, HistogramZebras, PeakingProfessional advantageCanon enables precise exposure control
Recording MediaCFexpress B + SD UHS-IICFexpress A + SD UHS-IISpeed advantageCF-B: 1700MB/s vs CF-A: 800MB/s
Buffer Depth (RAW)~200 frames @ 40fps~80 frames @ 10fps120 frame advantageCanon sustains high-speed shooting longer
Battery Life (CIPA)620 shots (LCD)600 shots (LCD)20 shots advantageNegligible difference in real use
LCD Resolution1.62M dots1.04M dots0.58M dots advantageCanon: Sharper focus verification
Body Weight670g (body only)658g (body only)12g heavierNegligible weight difference
Launch Price (2025)$2,799$1,999$800 premiumCanon commands 40% price premium

Performance Data Benchmarks

Rolling Shutter Measurements

  • Canon R6 Mark III: 13.5ms readout time
  • Panning speed tolerance: 90°/second before visible distortion
  • Helicopter rotor test: Minimal skew at 40fps
  • Sony A7 IV: 67.6ms readout time
  • Panning speed tolerance: 18°/second before visible distortion
  • Helicopter rotor test: Severe skew at 10fps

Stabilization Test Results

Focal LengthCanon R6 III (8.5 stops)Sony A7 IV (5.5 stops)Handheld Threshold
50mmSharp @ 1/2sSharp @ 1/8sCanon: 4x slower shutter
200mmSharp @ 1/8sSharp @ 1/30sCanon: 3.75x slower shutter
400mmSharp @ 1/15sSharp @ 1/60sCanon: 4x slower shutter

Video Bitrate & Recording Limits

FormatCanon R6 III BitrateMax Recording TimeSony A7 IV BitrateMax Recording Time
7K RAW 60p1800 Mbps23-35 min (temp dependent)N/AN/A
4K 60p 10-bit600 MbpsUnlimited (45°C limit)600 MbpsUnlimited (40°C limit)
4K 30p 10-bit300 MbpsUnlimited300 MbpsUnlimited
1080p 120fps200 MbpsUnlimited200 MbpsUnlimited

Autofocus Performance Metrics

  • Canon R6 Mark III:
  • Human Eye AF acquisition: 0.03s (EV 0)
  • Animal Eye AF acquisition: 0.05s (EV 0)
  • Low-light tracking failure rate: 8% @ EV -5
  • Sony A7 IV:
  • Human Eye AF acquisition: 0.04s (EV 0)
  • Animal Eye AF acquisition: 0.07s (EV 0)
  • Low-light tracking failure rate: 35% @ EV -5

Lens Ecosystem Cost Analysis (Professional Kit)

Lens TypeCanon RF PriceSony E-mount PriceSavings w/Sony
24-70mm f/2.8$2,299 (RF)$1,199 (Sigma)$1,100
70-200mm f/2.8$2,699 (RF)$1,399 (Tamron)$1,300
85mm f/1.4$1,899 (RF)$899 (Sigma)$1,000
Total Kit Cost$6,897$3,497$3,400

Note: Canon RF mount has no third-party AF lens options at launch. Sony ecosystem includes 40+ third-party AF lenses.


Thermal Performance Data

Recording Duration Tests (25°C Ambient)

FormatCanon R6 IIISony A7 IVTest Conditions
4K 60p 10-bit2 hours 15 min2 hours 30 minContinuous recording
4K 30p 10-bitUnlimitedUnlimitedNo overheating
7K RAW 60p23 min (standard) / 35 min (high-temp mode)N/AHigh-bitrate mode
1080p 120fpsUnlimitedUnlimitedStandard mode

Professional Workflow Impact Data

Post-Production Time Savings

TaskCanon R6 III (7K Source)Sony A7 IV (4K Source)Time Saved
4K Delivery from RAW2.1 hours1.8 hours+0.3 hours
Vertical Crop (9:16)15 minutes (from 7K Open Gate)45 minutes (separate shoot)30 minutes saved
Digital Stabilization8 minutes (minimal crop)22 minutes (significant crop)14 minutes saved
Color Grading Latitude4.5 stops recovery3.8 stops recoveryBetter highlight retention

Business ROI Analysis (5-Year Projection)

Cost FactorCanon SystemSony SystemDifference
Initial Body Investment$2,799$1,999+$800
3-Lens Professional Kit$6,897$3,497+$3,400
Annual Lens Expansion$2,400$1,200+$1,200
5-Year Total Cost$19,296$12,696+$6,600
Revenue ImpactRequires $1,320/mo additional income to justifyLower barrier to profitabilitySony: 52% faster ROI

Technical Verification Sources

  • Sensor readout measurements: [Camera Labs, November 2025]
  • IBIS performance testing: [DPReview Studio Tests, 2025]
  • Thermal testing data: [Imaging Resource Field Tests, October 2025]
  • AF low-light testing: [EOS Magazine Lab Results, November 2025]
  • Lens pricing data: [B&H Photo Professional Pricing, November 2025]

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *